🔗 Share this article

Are your professional networking connections viewing you as a thought leader? Do numerous commenters applauding your insights on expanding your business? Are headhunters making contact to explore opportunities?

If not, the explanation could be your gender.

The Test: Changing Gender Identity for Better Visibility

Numerous women participated in a collective LinkedIn experiment this week after popular discussions indicated that changing their gender to "man" boosted their network presence.

Other testers rewrote their profiles to include what they termed "bro-coded" terminology - inserting results-driven professional jargon like "drive", "revolutionize" and "accelerate". Anecdotally, their exposure also improved.

Systemic Preference Questions Brought Up

The engagement increase has led some to speculate whether an inherent sexism in LinkedIn's algorithm prioritizes male users who employ professional networking terminology.

Like many large social media platforms, LinkedIn utilizes a computerized system to determine which posts appear to which members - boosting some while suppressing others.

Platform Response

In a recent blog post, LinkedIn acknowledged the phenomenon but stated it does not consider "demographic information" when deciding content distribution. Instead, the company explained that "hundreds of signals" affect how posts perform.

Modifying profile gender in your settings does not influence how your content shows up in results or timelines.

Individual Results

A social media consultant, who changed her pronouns to "male pronouns" and her profile name to "a masculine version", described extraordinary outcomes.

"The statistics I'm observing show a 1,600% increase in profile views and a 1,300% increase in content views," she commented.

Megan Cornish, a communications strategist, started testing after observing her reach decrease significantly.

The Process

• First, she modified her gender to "male"
• Then, she used AI tools to rewrite her professional summary using "male-coded" wording
• Lastly, she recycled old posts with similar "assertive" language

The result was instantaneous: a 415% increase in reach within one week.

The Downside

Although the success, Cornish voiced unhappiness with the method.

"Before, my content were more personal - concise and insightful, but also warm and relatable," she explained. "Currently, the bro-coded version was forceful and confident - like a Caucasian man swaggering around."

She discontinued the experiment after one week, saying "Each day I continued, and results got better, I became more frustrated."

Varying Outcomes

Not all participants experienced positive results. One writer who changed both her profile gender to "man" and her race to "Caucasian" reported a reduction in reach and interaction.

"We understand there's systemic preference, but it's extremely difficult to understand how it operates in particular situations or the reasons behind it," she remarked.

Wider Consequences

These experiments coincide with ongoing discussions about LinkedIn's unique position as both a business platform and community site.

Recent changes in the past few months have reportedly caused female creators experiencing significantly reduced visibility, leading to unofficial tests where identical posts by men and women received vastly different reach.

System Details

Per LinkedIn, the network uses AI systems to categorize and distribute content based on multiple factors, including what's shared and the member's career profile.

The company claims it frequently assesses its systems, including "examinations of inequalities based on gender."

Company representative proposed that recent declines in some users' reach might originate from higher volume due to additional posts on the network.

Evolving Environment

According to a tester observed, "bro-coding" appears to be growing on the platform.

"People often view LinkedIn as more businesslike and polished," she remarked. "That's changing. It's turning into increasingly aggressive and less controlled."